Senate hits another dead end on unemployment benefits
By Paul Kane,                                     Updated: February 6 at 2:55 pm - Washington Post
The Senate remained gridlocked Thursday over the effort to renew emergency 
unemployment insurance for the long-term jobless, including more than 1.7 
million Americans without work who lost their benefits as the federal program 
expired in late December.
In a largely party-line vote, Democrats came a single vote shy of the 60-vote 
hurdle to break a filibuster by Republicans, who complained that the latest 
proposal did not have a proper offsetting spending cut to lessen the impact on 
the federal deficit. Additionally, the two sides continued to squabble over 
procedural matters related to how many amendments the Republicans would be 
allowed to offer.
gWe've given them everything they wanted,h Majority Leader Harry M. Reid 
(D-Nev.) told reporters before the vote, accusing the Republicans of not wanting 
to reach an actual deal. gThey canft take yes for an answer.h
The latest Democratic proposal, authored by Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), would 
extend the federal unemployment benefits program by three months at a cost of 
$6.4 billion. That program, coming in the wake of the gGreat Recessionh, has 
provided additional benefits to unemployed workers who have exhausted the normal 
26 weeks of insurance provided in each state.
Democrats had previously argued that these benefits should not be accompanied 
by offsetting cuts, because the purpose of the insurance program was to provide 
a boost both to the individual unemployed workers and to the economy as a 
stimulus. Reedfs latest proposal came with savings drawn from a pension 
smoothing proposal that allows companies to make different pension contributions 
based on historical averages, something that would lead to higher tax receipts 
for the Treasury.
Just four Republicans – Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Susan Collins (Maine), 
Dean Heller (Nev.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) – supported the new proposal. 
With 55 members of the Democratic caucus all in support, Reid needed just one 
more GOP vote to advance the bill into the formal debate. For procedural 
reasons, once the fate was certain, Reid voted with Republicans, making it a 
final 58-to-40 roll call.
Even if the Senate can reach a bipartisan deal on 
unemployment insurance, the House GOP majority has not shown interest in passing 
the legislation.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has held much of his ranks 
together largely as a protest to Reidfs refusal to allow the minority to offer 
amendments unless they pre-emptively guarantee that the bill will ultimately be 
approved as written by Democrats.
gIf we could enter into such an agreement, that would be a step in the right 
direction toward getting the Senate back to at least something close to the way 
it used to be operated, under which bills like that would frequently be brought 
up with no stipulations, and we would just start processing amendments,h 
McConnell told reporters recently.